| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 DCThanatos |
Date sent: 2015/11/17 18:50:10
Yelllooooo Guys, so rule 1... or is it 2? I'm pretty sure it's 1: No griefing. We all know that some people get so confused when they get banned about raiding, or stealing, even after they read the rules. Then some people will be like "Yea... No, -1 Because: {Insert reason about rule 1} And then some people like me will come in and be like "How are you going to punish someone for a rule that isn't specific" because really, it's just stpuid. Some people know better, others don't, and though there is no way to clarify it, it's better than nothing. So please, give me some feedback on what I have suggested, and I know most of the people that have been banned for raiding, stealing under the rule of griefing, will agree with me. -DC |
 Vulturboy |
Date sent: 2015/11/17 19:32:08
+1Needs to be done sooner or later..... |
 FuryLegacy |
Date sent: 2015/11/18 03:04:56
+1 |
 thomasjones |
Date sent: 2015/11/19 19:32:46
+1 also the swearing rule needs to be more specific so people cant say "I only said f*ck and sh*t like a million times,its not excessive." ok slightly over exaggerated but u get the point |
DCThanatos |
Date sent: 2015/11/19 20:04:42
fair point Thomas :P, +1 to your idea as well-DC |
 jackson_lt |
Date sent: 2015/11/20 19:59:02
+1 to DC. I agree fully. The vagueness of the anti greifing rule almost cost me my ability to play here. It should simply state: if it's not world generated and you didn't place it yourself, don't touch it without specific permission from the rightfull owner. Solution, no more accidental greifing. There is simply just too much stuff in the world that players still own but don't have claimed for different reasons. Players who have been here a while will know better because of other people screwing up. Also we should encourage new players to visit the forums. There's lots of good info here. My two pennies |
Vulturboy |
Date sent: 2015/11/23 04:12:36
Bump* |
thomasjones |
Date sent: 2015/11/28 22:17:22
Bumpy bump |
 MONKEYPAWNED |
Date sent: 2015/11/28 22:40:44
Agreed DC it does need to be specific and so does the swearing rule as well... many take advantage and fill the chat with fowl language and say its allowed? "not excessively" -is not specific enough for most people swearing a storm on the chat |
 Wowman2002 |
Date sent: 2015/11/29 07:51:33
Bumpidy |
